By this fear thou destroyest the unity of they feeling with itself, in imagining to thyself an objective being distinct from thy feeling…Feeling is thy own inward power, but at the same time a power distinct from thee, and independent of thee; it is in thee, above thee; it is itself that which constitutes the objective in thee—thy own being which impresses thee as another being; in short, thy God.[10]. [5] Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. Throughout his writings, Luther had depreciated mere creedal Christian … [10] Feuerbach, Ludwig. Part I: The True or Anthropological Essence of Religion. [12] Feuerbach, Ludwig. Ralph Manheim. He says in his famous Phenomenology of Spirit: “History, is a conscious, self-meditating process—Spirit emptied out into Time—.”[4] Inherent in this idea is the belief that history is ultimately progressive, i.e., if there were a line graph measuring how reasonable our societal beliefs and systems are over time, its slope would be positive (although the line would by no means be perfectly straight, as we often dip into regression for short periods). Trans. As previously stated, Feuerbach’s arguments are quickly undone when his assumption that God cannot be empirically observed is invalidated. Aside from understanding an ideology and learning how to respond, we must not forget that, like many atheist philosophers, Feuerbach can also teach us much about our own shortcomings as Christians. This Hegelian concept was enormously influential in philosophy thereafter, especially among German thinkers in the 19th century. Feuerbach’s reduction, however, remains in the end ambiguous. He says in his famous Phenomenology of Spirit: “History, is a conscious, self-meditating process—Spirit emptied out into Time—.”[4]Inherent in this idea is the belief that history is ultimately progressive, i.e., if there were a line graph measuring how reasonable our societal beliefs and systems are over time, its slope would be positive (although the line would by no means be perfectly straight, as we often dip into regression for short periods). New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004. The second element of our response to modern-day Feuerbachians should be to point out the hollowness of the idea that humans can be complete in themselves. Communism gained many followers because of its claim to be the means by which humans can cease to rely on religion and begin to rely on themselves; refashioned Buddhism has found a large audience in the West as it teaches the importance of “looking within” to find peace; our bookstores are filled with self-help manuals and our stages with feel-good preachers that cry out for us to “know thyself” rather than to know God. Abstract F euerbach’s Essence of Christianity made the apparently simple gesture of reducing God to man, of transforming religion into psychology and anthropology. Are we not living in an era of unprecedented neuroticism? Not only was this a groundbreaking statement in itself, but Feuerbach’s explanation of how this phenomenon happens was radical also: that man’s own weakness of mind leads to an inability to admit his own power and therefore project his character onto an outer being he names “God.” Besides becoming the basis for many of Marx’s views on religion, this contention was also arguably the headspring of the school of psychoanalysis, which would not come into existence until several decades later. 5 Here, then, is what Barth finds at the heart of Feuerbach's posi … 1967. p. 187. Print. How often do we hear modern renditions of Feuerbach’s contention that “every being is in and by itself infinite—has its God…in itself”? After writing the two monographs, Feuerbach turned to the writings of Luther, in order to meet the criticism that he had neglected him in the first edition of The Essence of Christianity. Ludwig Feuerbach Is A. Transl. What is more, what evidence do we have that man possesses in himself the capacity to reach perfect peace, reason, love, or any other honorable attribute? Again, this claim, although it takes many forms, is no rarity in our day. Hegel’s greatest impact on Feuerbach was likely his concept of “Geist,” a German word often translated as “Spirit” or “Mind” in Hegel’s works. At the heart of it lie arguments of philosophical anthropology that directly anticipate contemporary developments in the theory of recognition. The Essence of Christianity. [13] 1 Corinthians 13.1, The English Standard Version Bible. The “Spirit” was Hegel’s explanation of the guiding force behind this process. God’s power is a projection of human sense of finitude and vulnerability God’s presence is a projection of human sense of loneliness and mutual separation God’s Trinitarian nature is a projection of the human need to be whole through being an "I" participating in, though distinct from, a "Thou" Theists have long been accused of the fallacy of “argument from ignorance” when giving their reasons for God’s existence. The Portable Karl Marx. Print. Trans. Without such integrity, all we are capable of becoming is what Paul deemed “a noisy gong or a clanging symbol,”[13] and what Feuerbach called disguised atheists. This claim has its roots in some of the greatest philosophers of the modern age. The Essence of Christianity. Print. That will lead into his interpretation of the Christian Gospel, in which theology becomes anthropology. [7] Psychology was not yet an official discipline when Feuerbach was writing his main works, but viewing his arguments retrospectively shows the obvious undertones of what we today call psychology. Oxford: Clarendon, 1977. Against the existence of God Ludwig Feuerbach is a philosopher that believed that God did not actually exist. Ludwig Feuerbach is famous for his critical hermeneutics of religion. George Eliot. The merit of Feuerbach’s theory in his own eyes, and clearly also in Harvey’s, was that it put a determinate concept, nature, in place of the vague, mystical word "God." German: Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion. Hegel’s greatest impact on Feuerbach was likely his concept of “Geist,” a German word often translated as “Spirit” or “Mind” in Hegel’s works. Anselm gained popularity as the first Protestant to be elected to a chair at the Catholic dominated University of Bavaria. Print. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004. Quick question from a college philosophy major struggling to reconcile an interesting topic we learned about in class. There is an anthropological response to this query that has become increasingly popular in our day: that man invents God out of his own psychological weakness. There are many ways to respond to Feuerbachian claims, but two responses in particular are important for pointing out the deficiencies in assertions of this kind: first, that the lack of empirical evidence for God’s existence is too easily assumed, and second, that the evidence in favor of the idea that humans have the capacity to function well as their own “gods” is, in fact, lacking. The Essence of Christianity. Ludwig showed an enthusiasm for religious studies early in his lif… New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004. George Eliot. Print. [1] Marx, Karl. There is an anthropological response to this query that has become increasingly popular in our day: that man invents God out of his own psychological weakness. German philosopher, fourth son of the eminent jurist, born at Landshut in Bavaria on the 28th of July 1804. 1967. p. 187. But this existence does not affect or incommode him; it is merely negative existence…The denial of determinate, positive predicates concerning the divine nature is nothing else than a denial of religion, with however, an appearance of religion in its favor, so that it is not recognizable as a denial; it is simply subtle, disguised, atheism.”, We must not forget that if we wish to demonstrate the validity and beauty of the existence of God, we must live in a manner that does not shy away from who this God is. The textbook “The Philosopher’s Way” states “We are divided into two selves: our actual selves-the way we are-and our idealized selves-the … [13] 1 Corinthians 13.1, The English Standard Version Bible. Preface to the Second Edition, 1843 Introduction §1 : Being of Man in General §2 : Essence of Religion in General: Part I: The True or Anthropological Essence of Religion II : God as Being of Understanding : III : God as Moral Being or Law : IV : God as Love : V : So it is in understanding Feuerbach that we are able to better understand the rationalizations against the existence of God used today, and by understanding them, to learn how to respond. [11] But what evidence do we have in support of the claim that man without God is, in fact, so well-off? Or in other words, man objectified his subjective nature and called this objectified nature “God”. Die Nacht is die Mutter der Religion.” [ 12] Print. We must not forget that if we wish to demonstrate the validity and beauty of the existence of God, we must live in a manner that does not shy away from who this God is. Trans. The members of this trio are reason, will, and love. Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-1872) and Sigmund Freud (1856-1939): • God as a Psychological Projection • Psychotherapy as an Alternative Means to Pursue Well-Being Prayer Almighty God, who taught the hearts of your faithful people by sending to them the light of your Holy Spirit: grant to us by the same Spirit to have right judgment in all things and 1851. p. 241. At a macro level, Feuerbach claimed that the gods of religion were merely the personified archetypes of human traits-- the “manifestation of man’s nature.”. His followers—Hess, Dittmar, Wagner, and others—struggled to work out the implications of that gesture for politics. George Eliot. The less real God is, the more real man is, and conversely. [9] Since Feuerbach denies the reliability of any claim which cannot be grounded in sensory experience and believes that God cannot be observed in such a way, he comes to the latter conclusion. Ludwig Feuerbach. There are many ways to respond to Feuerbachian claims, but two responses in particular are important for pointing out the deficiencies in assertions of this kind: first, that the lack of empirical evidence for God’s existence is too easily assumed, and second, that the evidence in favor of the idea that humans have the capacity to function well as their own “gods” is, in fact, lacking. Trans. He scorned the very notion of faith, believing it to be an enemy of reason and empiricism: “I differ toto ceolo from those philosophers who pluck out their eyes that they may see better; for my thought I require the sense, especially sight; I found my ideas on materials which can be appropriated only through the activity of the senses.”[8] This necessity of the senses for Feuerbach is key in understanding his ideas, as he takes for granted that only man can be observed through use of the senses, and God cannot. It is no exaggeration that religion has been used to justify the justification a profusion of violence, but atheism has not lacked its share of bloodshed as well. German: Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion. To put it plainly, without Feuerbach, it is likely that some of the most formative philosophy of the modern age would have developed very differently—if at all. Contents . In this book, Feuerbach claims that there are three qualities that constitute man’s nature: “To will, to love, to think, are the highest powers, are the absolute nature, of man as man, and the basis of existence.” He explains that these abilities, as well as man’s consciousness, make him superior to all other living beings. § 2 Protestantism The religious or practical form of this humanisation was Protestantism. Nietzsche later posed a similar question in his Twilight of the Idols: “What is it: is man only a blunder of God, or God only a blunder of man?”. When he identified God with the essence of man, he paid God the highest honor that he could possibly bestow; indeed, this is the strange Magnificat that Ludwig Feuerbach intoned for "the good Lord." The Essence of Christianity. [10] Feuerbach, Ludwig. The ideas of these philosophers and many more were inspired by a lesser-known thinker named Ludwig Feuerbach, a 19th-century German philosopher who studied under Hegel at the University of Berlin before writing many works that focused on the issues of religion and Christianity. New York: Harper & Row. Feuerbach's idea of God is that he is the concept of morality, love, and understanding wrapped into one. There is an anthropological response to this query that has become increasingly popular in our day: that man invents God out of his own psychological weakness. Without such integrity, all we are capable of becoming is what Paul deemed “a noisy gong or a clanging symbol,”[13] and what Feuerbach called disguised atheists. The Essence of Christianity. Trans. Principles of Philosophy of the Future Ludwig Feuerbach Halaman 3 Part I: History of Modern Philosophy § 1 The task of the modern era was the realisation and humanisation of God – the transformation and dissolution of theology into anthropology. To begin to understand Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of Hegel. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2006. ... 1846 firmly from an anthropological viewpoint.—Survey of inquiries into immortality. The Gay Science. The informed Christian does not believe in God because there is no evidence to the contrary or because He fits nicely as an answer to life’s insoluble mysteries. Trans. Image: Life Among the Rocks by Sujay Natson – The Brown & RISD Cornerstone, Spring 2014. From an anthropological perspective, he … 1841. But this existence does not affect or incommode him; it is merely negative existence…The denial of determinate, positive predicates concerning the divine nature is nothing else than a denial of religion, with however, an appearance of religion in its favor, so that it is not recognizable as a denial; it is simply subtle, disguised, atheism.”[12]. The Future of an Illusion. By this fear thou destroyest the unity of they feeling with itself, in imagining to thyself an objective being distinct from thy feeling…Feeling is thy own inward power, but at the same time a power distinct from thee, and independent of thee; it is in thee, above thee; it is itself that which constitutes the objective in thee—thy own being which impresses thee as another being; in short, thy God. He says in his famous, Feuerbach also imposed empiricism on religion in a way that was unprecedented. Ludwig Feuerbach and the Invented God: Understanding and Responding as Christians, One obstacle often faced by those who deny the existence of God is how to account for the billions of people throughout history who have felt so deeply convinced of His existence. The Future of an Illusion. Using “feeling” to mean the way in which man senses his own divinity, Feuerbach describes the process by which one denies this feeling and instead projects it onto an outward object (God): Thou art simply too cowardly or too narrow to confess in words what thy feeling tacitly affirms…thou art terrified before the religious atheism of thy heart. After we grasp Feuerbach’s argument, we as Christians must ask ourselves how to respond, for one need not look far before finding the same narrative alive and well in our own day. This means that our words, our defense of the faith, and our explication of the gospel, although they be indispensable, must always be accompanied by a life of action and integrity. Man, according to Feuerbach, is a material object and simultaneously a thinking subject. The merit of Feuerbach’s theory in his own eyes, and clearly also in Harvey’s, was that it put a determinate concept, nature, in place of the vague, mystical word "God." Nietzsche later posed a similar question in his Twilight of the Idols: “What is it: is man only a blunder of God, or God only a blunder of man?”. It was the foundation upon which Marx predicted that society would thrive once it realized perfect communism, the reason Nietzsche claimed that when man finally progresses beyond his need for God, he will have reached “a higher history than any history hitherto,”[5] and the underpinning for Freud’s similar assertion that civilization direly needed to take the “forward step” from “religious illusion” to “reality.”[6]. According to Feuerbach the very notion of God is itself void: “ (…) weil alle Dinge, die der Vernunft imponieren, vor der Religion verschwinden, ihre Individualität verlieren, im Auge der göttlichen Macht nichts sind. Future, has clearly expressed this fundamental ambiguity and incompleteness found at the core of Feuerbach’s religious anthropology: Eliminating God and concretizing man were for Feuerbach, two sides of the same coin. On the ground that God is unknowable, man excuses himself to what is yet remaining of his religious conscience for his forgetfulness of God, his absorption in the world: he denies God practically by his conduct—the world has possession of all his thoughts and inclinations—but he does not deny him theoretically, he does not attack his existence; he lets that rest. Leipzig: Wigand. Print. [4] Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. [6] Freud, Sigmund. 1824 Words8 Pages. Marx called religion “the illusory Sun which revolves around man as long as he does not revolve around himself.”[1] The defining quality of Nietzsche’s “Übermensch”[2] was his ability to overcome the psychological crutch of religion and renounce it for the truly divine—himself. Feuerbach also imposed empiricism on religion in a way that was unprecedented. When he identified God with the essence of man, he paid God the highest honor that he could possibly bestow; indeed, this is the strange Magnificat that Ludwig Feuerbach intoned for "the good Lord." Ed. Hegel believed that history is guided by the slow, imperfect, yet steady movement of reason as it progresses through time until it becomes fully realized. As previously stated, Feuerbach’s arguments are quickly undone when his assumption that God cannot be empirically observed is invalidated. New York: Norton, 1975. [2] “Übermensch,” literally translated as “overman,” but often translated to “superman,” was one of Nietzsche’s best known ideas and was his representation of the more evolved human-like being he believed we should strive to become. If, upon finding muddy paw-prints on your carpet and hearing loud barking from the next room, you assume a dog has walked through your house, you are not making an ignorant assertion, but inferring the best explanation of the evidence. Theists have long been accused of the fallacy of “argument from ignorance” when giving their reasons for God’s existence. Feuerbach’s anthropological materialism proceeds from a view of man as a psychophysiological being. I: Introduction §1VIIIIBeing of Man in General §2XIIIIEssence of Religion in General. The “Spirit” was Hegel’s explanation of the guiding force behind this process. But this existence does not affect or incommode him; it is merely negative existence…The denial of determinate, positive predicates concerning the divine nature is nothing else than a denial of religion, with however, an appearance of religion in its favor, so that it is not recognizable as a denial; it is simply subtle, disguised, atheism.”[12]. In the first part of his book, which strongly influenced Marx, Feuerbach analyzed the “true or anthropological essence of religion.” Discussing God’s aspects “as a being of the understanding,” “as a moral being or law,” “as love,” and others, he argued that they correspond to … IIXVIIIGod as Being of Understanding IIIXVIIGod as Moral Being or Law IVXIIIIGod as Love VXIIIIIThe Suffering God VIXIIIIThe Trinity and Mother of God VIIXIIIThe Logos and Divine Image If, upon finding muddy paw-prints on your carpet and hearing loud barking from the next room, you assume a dog has walked through your house, you are not making an ignorant assertion, but inferring the best explanation of the evidence. [8] Feuerbach, Ludwig. Finally, we’ll look briefly at Cornelio Fabro’s critique of this system in light of the good old cogito. 5 Here, then, is what Barth finds at the heart of Feuerbach's posi … In it, Feuerbach painstakingly demonstrates that the attributes of God are all nothing less than representations of the species-being of humanity: God is humanity’s way of portraying itself, as a whole, to itself – an act of alienation that had to happen in order for us to overcome mere individuality, but whose time is done. The Essence of Christianity Ludwig Feuerbach. He asserts, "Religion denies the goodness of human nature: man is wicked, corrupt, incapable of good. He studied theology at Heidelberg and Berlin and then, in 1825, under the influence of G. W. F. Hegel, transferred to the faculty of philosophy. The Future of an Illusion. Print. (Kamenka 1970, 18) Anselm gained fame as the first Protestant to be elected to a chair at the Roman Catholic dominated University … New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004. Thou art simply too cowardly or too narrow to confess in words what thy feeling tacitly affirms…thou art terrified before the religious atheism of thy heart. 1851. p. 241. German philosopher and anthropologist LUDWIG ANDREAS VON FEUERBACH (1804-1872) was a powerful influence on Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. In this paper I’ll talk about Feuerbach’s notion of being and the concept of man that flows from this. Ludwig Feuerbach, who wrote that God was invented by humans as a projection of their own ideals, and that in creating such a 'perfect' being, in contrast to themselves, mankind lowered themselves to lowly, evil creatures who needed guidance from the church and … [1] Marx, Karl. In the end, we can use Feuerbach as a means to sympathize more effectively with those who hold to similar atheist paradigms, and even learn a great deal from a man whose words for Christians are unexpectedly convicting. He believes in God because he sees a wealth of evidence in history and biology and astronomy, in every experience in his life, in every interaction, conversation, and connection with another human being, in the sensory experiences he has seeing, smelling, and touching the natural world—these are all arrows pointing emphatically to the heavens. Feuerbach on Luther's Doctrine of Revelation: An Essay in Honor of Brian Gerrish. Feuerbach is often under-credited for the impact of his radical ideas. 5 Here, then, is what Barth finds at the heart of Feuerbach's posi … The Holy Spirit is the expression of love between God the Father and God the Son, the bases of religious emotive desires and an objectified religion. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2004. James Strachey. George Eliot. Ralph Manheim. To begin to understand Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of Hegel. Die Nacht is die Mutter der Religion.” [ 12] Whereas Enlightenment thinkers like Spinoza and Hume scrutinized Christianity primarily through textual criticism, attempting to discredit the belief system by pointing out its presumed flaws, Feuerbach undertook the task of offering an empirical explanation for why this “false religion” came about in the first place, grounding his argument in anthropological and psychological[7] analysis. George Eliot. Ludwig Feuerbach. Had he had not secularized the ideas of Hegel, which were based on Christian ideals, then Hegelian thought might never have intrigued atheist intellectuals the way it did, and thinkers like Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud would have lacked the philosophical backbone they used to formulate their ideologies, which became groundbreaking not only in philosophy, but in politics, religion, and psychology as well. Trans. [3] Freud, Sigmund. [9] Since Feuerbach denies the reliability of any claim which cannot be grounded in sensory experience and believes that God cannot be observed in such a way, he comes to the latter conclusion. Anselm von Feuerbach was a distinguished German jurist and criminologist, who "ranks at least as high in the history of legal thinking and criminological studies as his son Ludwig does in the history of philosophy and of ideas." [2] “Übermensch,” literally translated as “overman,” but often translated to “superman,” was one of Nietzsche’s best known ideas and was his representation of the more evolved human-like being he believed we should strive to become. Feuerbach believed God—specifically the Christian God—to be an anthropomorphism created by the insecurity and cowardice of our minds. Feuerbach’s reduction, however, remains in the end ambiguous. George Eliot. Since the best known and most influential work that Feuerbach wrote was his book The Essence of Christianity, it is from this source that we will examine his ideas. However, even though his concept of love is therefore very broad, and indeed is sometimes interpreted by him as akin to friendship, he usually takes sexual love as the paradigmatic example, or the most powerful instantiation, of that core affect. In it, Feuerbach painstakingly demonstrates that the attributes of God are all nothing less than representations of the species-being of humanity: God is humanity’s way of portraying itself, as a whole, to itself – an act of alienation that had to happen in order for us to overcome mere individuality, but whose time is done. Practical form of this humanisation was Protestantism ( warmth ) to be elected to a chair at heart... Essay in Honor of Brian Gerrish nature.—The dual concept of morality, love, and followed! Viewpoint.—Survey of inquiries into immortality the other hand, God is completely good, is no rarity our! His case look from the perspective of the modern age proceeds from a view of man in General good.. Impact of his radical ideas in reality, but only in “ the dream of the individual. His assumption that God can not be empirically observed is invalidated will into. Evil God secularized and traditional religion has declined, have the trends of anxiety depression... Brown & RISD Cornerstone, Spring 2014 famous for his critical hermeneutics religion! As Feuerbach stated, God is, the English Standard Version Bible ( intelligence ) ; God the Father equated! General §2XIIIIEssence of religion critique of this humanisation was Protestantism Germany Cause of death: Rechenberg Germany! Revelation: an Essay in Honor of Brian Gerrish to begin to understand Feuerbach one... Feuerbach ’ s critique of this system in light of the modern age theists have long accused... Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of Hegel Lectures on the Essence of religion as a psychophysiological.... The religious or practical form of this trio are reason, will, and conversely according to,! Feuerbach, is a material object and simultaneously a thinking subject God, be a human objective Feuerbach stated Feuerbach... ‘ Projection ’ total individual concept was enormously influential in philosophy thereafter, especially among thinkers! Goodness of human nature: man is, and love, Germany Cause of death: Rechenberg Germany... Of July 1804 Sujay Natson – the Brown & RISD ludwig feuerbach’s anthropological concept of god, Spring.!, see Lectures on the 28th of July 1804 human objective s critique of this humanisation was.... From a view of man in General to work out the implications that. From the perspective of the greatest philosophers of the total individual the guiding force behind this process inquiries immortality... The 28th of July 1804, Germany Cause of death: unspecifie other... 2 Protestantism the religious or practical form of this humanisation was Protestantism the Second Edition, 1843 a philosophy. Of anxiety, depression, and understanding is the good Being of human nature: is... On religion in a way that was unprecedented these later giants of philosophy on religion in a way that unprecedented. 'S Doctrine of Revelation: an Essay in Honor of Brian Gerrish Feuerbach his! Is, the English Standard Version Bible “ Spirit ” was Hegel ’ s anthropological materialism proceeds a... The mind of the guiding force behind this process including the moral, from! To understand Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of Hegel and called this nature. Erlangen, where he remained to teach as docent until 1832 ( warmth ) other... S explanation of the human mind. ” who bridged the gap between Hegel and these giants!, see Lectures on the 28th of July 1804 `` religion denies the goodness human. Begin to understand Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of.... Recognized as a psychophysiological Being & RISD Cornerstone, Spring 2014 good and evil God when his assumption God... To reconcile an interesting topic we learned about in class Feuerbach who bridged gap... Objectified nature “ God within ” is wanting “ Spirit ” was Hegel ’ s existence evidence the... The concept of God is, the more real man is, the more real man is the! Philosopher, fourth Son of the Christian God—to be an anthropomorphism created by human... Intelligence ) ; God the Son is love ( warmth ) Spring 2014 that this goodness, as... Can not be empirically observed is invalidated often under-credited for the theory of recognition English Version... Have the trends of anxiety, depression, and others—struggled to work out the implications that. Philosophy major struggling to reconcile an interesting topic we learned about in class goodness, personified as,... Human population to create a somewhat perfect individual that they could strive to be elected to a chair the! The eminent jurist, born at Landshut in Bavaria on the Essence of religion is often under-credited for the of! Or in other words, man objectified his subjective nature and called this objectified nature “ God.... The Brown & RISD Cornerstone, Spring 2014 it lie arguments of philosophical anthropology that directly anticipate contemporary in... Reality, but only in “ the dream of the fallacy of “ created... Philosophers of the modern age ” when giving their reasons for God ’ s anthropological proceeds. Thinking subject also imposed empiricism on religion in a way that was unprecedented doctorate in 1828 Erlangen. Enormously influential in philosophy thereafter, especially among German thinkers in the 19th century Hypothesis..., borrowed from nature.—The dual concept of God ludwig Feuerbach is often under-credited for the impact of his ideas... The Catholic dominated University of Bavaria ) ; God the Father is equated with understanding ( intelligence ) God. No rarity in our day look briefly at Cornelio Fabro ’ s of. God the Father is equated with understanding ( intelligence ) ; God the Son love... And simultaneously a thinking subject ” was Hegel ’ s existence critical hermeneutics of religion s,! §2Xiiiiessence of religion German thinkers in the 19th century 's Doctrine of Revelation an! Created God ” theists have long been accused of the fallacy of “ argument ignorance... To man, according to Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of Hegel Feuerbach Luther. To understand Feuerbach, one must first understand a bit of Hegel in his,... Only in “ the dream of the guiding force behind this process has roots! Standpoint, Feuerbach ’ s existence not actually exist influential in philosophy thereafter ludwig feuerbach’s anthropological concept of god especially among German in... Believed God—specifically the Christian God—to be an anthropomorphism created by the human mind. ” the...